Abstract Background The outcome of breast cancer treatment largely depends on the timing of detection. The health promotion interventions have an immense contribution to early detection and improved survival.
Carcinomul Ovarian_Ghid ESMO
Therefore, this review aimed to provide evidence on the efficacy of the health promotion interventions to increase the uptake of breast cancer screening and to develop effective interventions targeting women. The score was rated for the included articles by each researcher independently and the average score is given accordingly.
- Ghidul clinic pentru obstetrică şi ginecologie pe tema cancerului ovarian precizează standardele, principiile şi aspectele fundamentale ale conduitei particularizate unui caz concret clinic, care trebuie respectată de practicieni indiferent de nivelul unităţii sanitare în care activează.
- Gradul din numrul total al cancerelor ovariene, dar incidena tumoral este un factor suplimentar de determinare a acestui tip histologic variaz la nivel mondial.
Results The review dovetailed 22 studies. Thirteen studies Conclusion The review confirmed that most of the health promotion interventions targeting women boosted the breast screening in one or another way.
However, the limited quality of the included studies showed that further research is needed to improve the trials in the next future. Introduction The global burden of breast cancer in women is enormous in the developed and the developing world.
Mult mai mult decât documente.
It is estimated that over women were died in globally due to breast cancer. Its incidence is increasing in the developing world due to increased life expectancy, urbanization and adoption of western lifestyles.
The death toll for that same year was estimated at 39 deaths. Studies published as of January — were searched. Reference lists of included studies were also scanned to identify additional relevant papers.
All articles were published in English language. Finally, a total of 22 articles were identified.
We limited our review to start from since the previous review was included the articles up to in one or another way. Exclusion criteria i focused on survivors of breast cancer biomedical treatment and rehabilitation. All ovarian cancer treatment guidelines groups were included in this study review since the recommendation of cancer screening test varies in developing countries to developed countries; even there is even no guideline in some countries. Two investigators then independently reviewed all located articles to confirm whether inclusion criteria were met.
The rest investigators also reviewed to check its consistency. In cases of doubt based on abstracts, the articles were included for full-text articles review.
Ovarian cancer treatment guidelines authors independently reviewed all full-text articles to confirm whether inclusion criteria were met or ovarian cancer treatment guidelines. The data were synthesized in two ways: first, the study design and intervention strategies were presented for all 22 studies that met inclusion criteria.
Second, the findings of each study were analyzed.
Study designs were classified into randomized controlled trials RCTs; including cluster RCT and randomized controlled crossover trial ovarian cancer treatment guidelines, quasi-experimental study or non-equivalent control group.
In order to present reliable evidence on intervention ovarian cancer treatment guidelines, quality assessments were conducted following the criteria Data Collection Checklist from the Cochrane EPOC guidelines.